Legal Opinion

Gelber v. Sheraton-Hawaii Corporation

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1966No. 4443PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MIZÜHA, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict against plaintiff, who claimed in an action for damages that defendant’s steps had been maintained in a negligent fashion in disregard of the duty owed to her as a patron of the hotel. According to plaintiff, she tripped and fell when she was descending the steps at the main entrance of defendant’s hotel. The evidence is not conclusive as to the exact step on which she tripped, or as to what caused her to trip and fall. Both plaintiff and her husband testified that after the fall, they noticed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. McCarthy v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  5. Lynch v. Oregon Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City and County of Honolulu v. BennettHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Tittle v. HurlbuttHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Rossell v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API