Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Oregon Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1939No. 9116PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

In an action brought by appellant to recover for personal injuries, judgment and verdict were rendered for appellees. Appellant seeks review of the judgment urging only error in the instructions of the court.

Appellant was employed by the company as a “choker setter” in a logging camp belonging to the company. The company was engaged in bringing logs from the woods to a spar tree by means of power-driven donkey engines. The spar tree was on the top of a hill. The logs were then hauled from a pile at that point some seven hundred feet to a loading landing by means of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Woodworkers Tool Works v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. State v. RadabaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API