Legal Opinion

Alpine Industries, Inc. v. Gohl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1984No. 49780-0PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This case presents several issues requiring interpretation of the rules governing trial and appellate procedure. The first issue raised is whether a trial court's ruling on a CR 59(j) application for leave to file a new trial motion is an appealable order under RAP 2.2. We hold that, under the circumstances presented here, such a ruling constitutes a final order after judgment appealable pursuant to RAP 2.2(a)(13). The second issue raised is whether a trial court has jurisdiction to entertain a CR 59(j) application after the appellate court has issued its mandate. We hold the trial court has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Alpine Industries, Inc. v. GohlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fox v. SackmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Doss v. SchullerWashington Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Yakima County v. Yakima Herald-RepublicWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kwiatkowski v. DrewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Yakima v. Yakima Herald-RepublicWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. LarranagaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API