Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1990No. 23164PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The sole issue for determination in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s denial of the Petitioners’ motion for a directed verdict. At trial, the Petitioners moved for a directed verdict that the Respondent-Plaintiff had failed to establish her case against them for false arrest and false imprisonment. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision in Jones v. City of Columbia, Opinion No. 89-MO-022 (filed February 6, 1989).

FACTS

Wilma Jones (Jones) sued the City of Columbia and two of its police officers, Lolita Patterson and Michael Johnson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parrott v. Plowden Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Manley v. ManleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Timmons v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Roberts v. City of Forest AcresDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
  4. Wortman v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Gist v. Berkeley County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API