Legal Opinion

Parrott v. Plowden Motor Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 4, 1965No. 18387PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for both actual and punitive damages in The Civil Court *320of Florence, in May, 1964. Timely motions for nonsuit, directed verdict, judgment n. o. v. or in the alternative for a new trial were made by defendant and denied. This appeal followed.

The complaint alleges that defendant acting through its duly authorized agent caused plaintiff to be arrested under a warrant charging him with disposing of a pickup truck while under an alleged lien. As a result thereof…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Margolis v. TelechSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Prosser v. ParsonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. China v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Elletson v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Martin v. O'DanielKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Goodwin v. MettsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Eaves v. Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API