Legal Opinion
Time Warner AxS v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 1995-0587PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 229.] TIME WARNER AXS, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, INC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as Time Warner AxS v. Pub. Util. Comm.,
1996-Ohio-224.] Public Utilities Commission—Telecommunications—Alternative regulation— Commission exceeded scope of its statutory authority when it used alternative rate-setting methods to establish…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Burger Brewing Co. v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Athens Cty. Dept. of Job v. Martin, 07 Ca 11 (4-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Columbus Southern Power Co. v. FaisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Sharp, 08 Ca 000002 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000