Legal Opinion

Escano v. The ADT Security Corporation

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided January 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00908Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ______________________ RUBEN ESCANO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:24-cv-00908-KWR-GBW THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION, and JOHN DOE, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4). Having reviewed the record and applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is not well taken and, therefore, is DENIED. At issue is whether Plaintiff plausibly alleged that Defendant The ADT Security Corporation (“ADT”)1 is vicariously liable under the Telephone…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Edward Bontkowski v. Brian SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API