Adams v. Franklin

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendants Bill Franklin, Garry Bowers, Morris Rogers and Phillip Estes’ (collectively “Defendants”) Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.”), filed January 19, 2000. Plaintiff Neal Adams (“Plaintiff’) filed a Response (“Resp.”) on February 4, 2000. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendants’ Motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part.

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

The court exercises subject matter…