Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 23, 2011No. 10-4466Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Cecilia Espinoza seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition for review.
Espinoza is a citizen of Mexico who entered the United States in 1993. In 2004, the Government charged her with removability as an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(a)(6)(A)® [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)® ]. Espinoza conceded that she was removable and, through counsel, applied for cancellation of removal…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
- Jose Borges v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Efrain Modesto Calle-Vujiles v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.