Legal Opinion

Boostrom v. Bach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1992No. 82A04-9008-CV-372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Plaintiff-Appellant, Rebecca Boostrom, appeals from the summary judgment granted for Defendant-Appellant, Stephen Bach, We reverse and remand.

Issue

Boostrom presents three issues for our review; however, because we reverse, we only need to address the following:

Did the trial court err when it refused to order that the Complaint, which was not accompanied by a filing fee, be file-marked the date of its certified mailing?

Facts and Procedural History

On January 12, 1990, Boostrom sent her Complaint against attorney Stephen Bach by certified mail to the Vanderburgh Small…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Diane Rodgers, on Behalf of Sharon Jones, A/K/A Sharon Rodgers v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Elles v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hanks v. FloydAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Seastrom, Inc. v. Amick Construction Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Brady v. EASTERN INDIANA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASS'NIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API