Boostrom v. Bach
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
CHEZEM, Judge.
Defendant-Appellee, - Stephen _ Bach ("Bach"), contends that we erred in our published opinion reversing the trial court's entry of summary judgment granted in his favor. See, Boostrom v. Back (1992), Ind. App., 589 N.E.2d 275. In particular, he argues that statutory law requires prepayment of filing fees in small claims cases; that there was no competent or admissible evidence submitted in opposition to his summary judgment motion; and there was a complete failure of proof as to the damage element of the legal malpractice claim brought by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bedree v. Sandler & SandlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Boostrom v. BachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- LTL TRUCK SERVICE, LLC v. Safeguard, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matusky v. Sheffield Square ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994