Legal Opinion

Boostrom v. Bach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1992No. 82A04-9008-CV-372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

CHEZEM, Judge.

Defendant-Appellee, - Stephen _ Bach ("Bach"), contends that we erred in our published opinion reversing the trial court's entry of summary judgment granted in his favor. See, Boostrom v. Back (1992), Ind. App., 589 N.E.2d 275. In particular, he argues that statutory law requires prepayment of filing fees in small claims cases; that there was no competent or admissible evidence submitted in opposition to his summary judgment motion; and there was a complete failure of proof as to the damage element of the legal malpractice claim brought by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bedree v. Sandler & SandlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. LTL TRUCK SERVICE, LLC v. Safeguard, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matusky v. Sheffield Square ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API