Legal Opinion

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. Continental Can Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 4, 1971No. 64 Civ. 217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. (hereinafter “Tri-Wall”), a New York Corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of corrugated paper board containers. Tri-Wall’s prominent product, triple wall board, is described and produced in accordance with the teachings of United States Letters Patent No. 3,096,224.1 Tri-Wall 2 alleges literal infringement of this patent by defendant Continental Can Company, Inc., (hereinafter “Continental”), a New York Corporation.

*702Jurisdiction and venue are conferred under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API