Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. Continental Can Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. (hereinafter “Tri-Wall”), a New York Corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of corrugated paper board containers. Tri-Wall’s prominent product, triple wall board, is described and produced in accordance with the teachings of United States Letters Patent No. 3,096,224.1 Tri-Wall 2 alleges literal infringement of this patent by defendant Continental Can Company, Inc., (hereinafter “Continental”), a New York Corporation.
*702Jurisdiction and venue are conferred under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973