Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Carpenter

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1985No. 84-1719PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge:

Mark Carpenter appeals from his convictions on three counts of perjury before a grand jury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 contending that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and arguing two theories of conflict of interest by his defense counsel. Finding the evidence to be sufficient and no conflict of. interest to have existed, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Mark Carpenter was charged in a four-count indictment with perjury before a grand jury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. After a jury trial, Carpenter was found guilty on Counts 1, 2, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. PlacenteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Ricardo M. InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Perillo v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. RicoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API