Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Hermes

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. Docket 65015PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court issued an order determining that defendants were liable to plaintiffs for conversion of fish taken under color of tribal fishing rights reserved to the Chippewa Indians by treaty with the United States government. The court ruled that defendants’ tribal memberships, conferred upon them by mistake, could not immunize them from civil liability for unlawful fishing. Defendants appeal as of right.

This appeal compels us to re-examine the nature of the state’s property interest in Great Lakes fish and to determine what, if any, civil remedies are available to the state when this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Thoma v. Tracy Motor Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. United States v. Oranna Bumgarner FelterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Rohe Scientific Corp. v. National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Ladd v. Ford Consumer Finance Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API