Legal Opinion

Rhoderick v. Swartzell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 29, 1933No. 5729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, brought this bill in equity' for the cancellation of the release of a deed of trust. The defendants named in the bill are Luther A. Swart-zell, Edmund D. Rheem (individually and as trustees), Shoreham Investment Company, a corporation; John H. Holmead, J. Newton Brewer, Trustee; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a corporation; Clarence Dodge, trustee; Harry Wardman, Thomas P. Bones, Swartzell, Rheem & Hensey Company, a corporation; Henry P. Blair, Julius I. Pey-ser, and Michael M. Doyle, receivers; and Huntington Terrace…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Lawson v. United States Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Williams v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Allen v. St. Louis BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colby v. Riggs Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Hazen v. HawleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1936
  3. Garrity v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  4. Davis v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Ansberry v. HarrahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API