Legal Opinion

Davis v. Casey

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 6, 1939No. 7015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs and intervenors below from a final decree of the District Court dismissing on the merits a hill in equity for the cancellation of a release, the reinstatement of a deed of trust, and foreclosure.

On the 7th day of November, 1925, Rose G. Casey delivered to Swartzell, Rheem and Hensey Company of Washington, D. C.,1 her 309 promissory notes in the total sum of $190,000. To secure to the holder or holders payment at maturity, Mrs. Casey simultaneously executed to Luther A. Swartzell and Edmund D. Rheem, trustees, a deed of trust on an apartment building…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Ruth Whitehead v. American Security and Trust Company, American Security and Trust Company v. Ned Whitehead, and Whitehead and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. HenryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Silver Spring Title Co. v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Jones v. Hamilton National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API