Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Baldwin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The principles of law upon this subject are thoroughly discussed in Littig v. Littig (1938), 229 Wis. 430, 437, 282 N. W. 547, where the court said:

“Ordinarily, the amount to be allowed for the support and maintenance of a divorced wife will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Hooper v. Hooper, 102 Wis. 598, 78 N. W. 753; Newton v. Newton, 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105; Gauger v. Gauger, 157 Wis. 630, 147 N. W. 1075; Goerner v. Goerner, 182 Wis. 18, 195 N. W. 879; Voegeli v. Voegeli, 204 Wis. 363, 236 N. W. 123; Luedke v. Luedke, 215 Wis. 303, 254 N. W. 525. But this court may on appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Thomas v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Littig v. LittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hooper v. HooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Luedke v. LuedkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruun v. BruunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Borchers v. BorchersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API