Legal Opinion

Bruun v. Bruun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The defendant cites several Wisconsin cases which hold that courts may modify the provisions of a judgment in a divorce action relating to alimony and support money only where there has been a substantial or material change in the circumstances of the parties. Littig v. Littig, 229 Wis. 430, 282 N. W. 547; Baldwin v. Baldwin, 253 Wis. 200, 33 N. W. (2d) 198; Lerner v. Lerner, 252 Wis. 87, 31 N. W. (2d) 208; Romanowski v. Romanowski, 245 Wis. 199, 14 N. W. (2d) 23; Setzer v. Setzer, 251 Wis. 234, 29 N. W. (2d) 62.

This rule is of almost universal application. 2 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment (2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Littig v. LittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Setzer v. SetzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lerner v. LernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Romanowski v. RomanowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Peck v. PeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kritzik v. KritzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thies v. MacDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Klipstein v. KlipsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API