Luedke v. Luedke

Appellant’s income has’been very materially reduced’ under what it was .when alimony was fixed ip the judgment.- The facts are-fairly-summarized by the learned trial judge as follows :

“While during the past year and a half defendant’s income has been ‘lean,’ it is not contended that’ his estate has ' been.materially or permanently diminished or impaired.”

We are concerned first 'with whether the trial court’s refusal to modify the judgment by reducing the amount of *305alimony amounted to an abuse of discretion. The figures show that appellant’s gross income in 1925 was $58,075.14; in 1932,…