Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Shore

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2008No. 34568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Rodney Peterson appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of William R. Shore and Roberta S. Shore. The Shores cross-appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for attorney fees. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the summary judgment but reverse the denial of attorney fees and remand for additional proceedings.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In 2001, Peterson relocated his business from his home to property owned by the Shores. The Shores had purchased the property for $120,873. At the time…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sanders v. Kuna Joint School DistrictIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ShoreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Tricore Investments LLC v. Estate of WarrenIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API