Metromont Materials Corp. v. R.B.R. & S.T.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs sole assignment of error, under which it presents many contentions, is that the trial court erred in awarding prejudgment interest from 4 May 1989. It first argues that the trial court erred in awarding prejudgment interest because “[a]s a general rule the North Carolina Courts do not recognize the granting of prejudgment interest on unliquidated damages or those which are not readily ascertainable.” We disagree.
Prejudgment interest on contracts is governed by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-5(a) (1991). Prior to its amendment in 1985, G.S. § 24-5(a) provided that “[a] 11…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Sampson-Bladen Oil Co., Inc. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Steelcase, Inc. v. Lilly Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silicon Knights, Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Sockwell & Associates, Inc. v. Sykes Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Beach Mart, Inc. v. L&L Wings, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997