Steelcase, Inc. v. Lilly Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant’s Appeal
Without making reference to any exception or assignment of error, defendant presents an argument contending that this case is “a products liability action” and that under applicable provisions of the Products Liability Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99B-4, the jury’s answer to issue number 3 under the implied warranty claim defeats plaintiff’s claim and entitles defendant to judgment in its favor as a matter of law. The pertinent portions of the statute provide:
G.S. § 99B-4. Injured parties’ knowledge or reasonable care. No manufacturer or seller shall be held liable in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Wilkes Computer Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- In Re Goddard & Peterson, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Metromont Materials Corp. v. R.B.R. & S.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Beach Mart, Inc. v. L&L Wings, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.