Paschall v. Penry
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. Arson Rainey. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Judge,
Section B.—This is a suit by defendant in error against plaintiff in error on a promissory note executed and delivered by plaintiff in error to Frances Ann Herman. The'note is for $300, and was given as a part of the purchase price of a certain tract of land purchased by plaintiff in error from Frances Ann Herman and S. L. Herman. Defendant in error alleges that he became the owner and purchaser of the note for value, and asks for judgment for the amount of the note, principal and interest, and for foreclosure of vendor’s lien on the land. The suit was filed December 7, 1889.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wheeler v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Moore v. HazelwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Doyle v. HordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- Briley v. HayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Wuest v. MoehrigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Wilson v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Morgan v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Leo Sheep Co. v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921