Leo Sheep Co. v. Davenport

Defendant, in error sued plaintiff in error company to recover a balance of $2,000, alleged to be due'upon a lease, and the further sum of $108, -for feed which it is alleged plaintiff in error purchased. A writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon 300 sheep belonging to plaintiff in error. Plaintiff in error answered by general demurrer, general denial, and by way of cross-action alleged that early in October, 1919, defendant in error, through his agent, Ans-ley Land & Cattle Company, represented to its president that defendant in error had about 15,000 acres of land in Bailey county…