Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Continental Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1928No. 6126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlLLER, PRESIDENT:

This action was brought by notice of motion on a policy of insurance on the life of Mary Lee Hoston, by her father Will Stockton, the beneficiary named therein. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, nil debet, and fraud in the procurement of the policy. The trial court set aside a verdict for the defendant, and awarded the plaintiff a new trial.

The defendant introduced evidence to prove that the insured was afflicted with tuberculosis, the disease from which she died, at the time the application for insurance was made; and that the plaintiff, after her death, released the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwarzbach v. Ohio Valley Protective UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Logan v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Marshall v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woody v. Continental Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dye v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Leadman v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Saltesz v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Moore v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API