Legal Opinion
Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Town of Carrollton
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided September 16, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Appeal from circuit court of Carroll county. Appellant is the successor to the rights and title of the Water, Light & Transit Company mentioned in Ordinance No. 347 of the Town of Carrollton. The respondents are* the Town and its Mayor and Councilunen. The Town of Carrollton is governed by special charter and contains between 4000 and 5000 inhabitants. Appellant brought two suits which were consolidated and tried as one. The purpose of the suits was to enjoin the Town from constructing a municipal electric and water plant and to procure a declaratory judgment construing certain provisions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Mansfield v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- State Ex Rel. McMonigle v. SpearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Sho-Me Power Corp. v. City of Mountain GroveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jackson County Public Water Supply District No. 1 v. Ong Aircraft Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.