Legal Opinion

Jack's Maintenance Contractors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1983No. 82-4073PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the deductibility by the taxpayer, Jack’s Maintenance Contractors, Inc., of legal fees paid for its sole shareholder’s defense against criminal tax evasion charges. The Tax Court found that the taxpayer could deduct the fees as ordinary and necessary business expenses. Because we find that the payments were constructive dividends to the shareholder, and further that they were not ordinary and necessary expenses of the taxpayer, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

The facts of this case as found by the Tax Court are uncontested. For a number of years, Jack Farmer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lohrke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  2. Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Philip K. Smith, United States of America v. McIver & Smith Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Charles W. Ireland and Carolyn P. Ireland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Cummins Diesel Sales of Oregon, Inc. v. United States of America, Robert H. Wills and Lillian Wills v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Cirelli v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Capital Video Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Joseph M. McKenney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Rodriguez v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API