Legal Opinion

Cummins Diesel Sales of Oregon, Inc. v. United States of America, Robert H. Wills and Lillian Wills v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1963No. 18438, 18439PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

The District Court correctly stated and applied the pertinent legal principles in deciding these tax refund suits adversely to appellant taxpayers (207 F.Supp. 746 (D.Or.1962)). Indeed, appellants do not contend to the contrary.

However, appellants contend that the District Court erred in finding as matters of fact: (1) that earnings and profits of the corporate appellant were permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of its business in 1955 and 1956, and the corporate appellant was availed of for the purpose of avoiding the income tax with respect to its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cummins Diesel Sales of Oregon, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cornelius G. Noble and Pansy H. Noble v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Jack's Maintenance Contractors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Capital Video Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Golconda Mining Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Suwannee Lumber Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API