Legal Opinion

Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1978No. 76-1839PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:

In these conversion actions, consolidated on appeal, the federal court is asked for a decision we consider impossible. The immediate question is whether the district court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The district court determined that it should refrain from deciding the issue on the merits, the rights to oil extracted from the Persian Gulf, because the decision would call into question the acts of foreign states. We dismiss on the slightly different ground that the question presented is political, being both constitutionally…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Niedringhaus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Richard D. Bokum, Ii, Margaret B. Bokum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API