Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1999No. 25008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*25ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

MOORE, Justice:

Petitioner pled guilty to thirteen counts of forgery then filed this application for post-conviction relief (PCR) which was denied. We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of relief and now reverse.

FACTS

Petitioner was not represented by counsel during her guilty plea proceeding. The plea judge told petitioner:

You have a right to a lawyer. You have a right to a trial by jury. You do not have to testify. The State is required to prove you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If you do not testify, I’d charge the jury they could not hold that against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. StuckeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Bridwell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API