Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1991No. 23547PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

Petitioner was convicted of two counts of assault and battery with intent to kill and one count of possession of explosive material without a license. His direct appeal was dismissed after review pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E. (2d) 60 (1986). We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of postconviction relief (PCR) and now reverse.

Petitioner contends the waiver of his right to counsel at trial was not knowing and voluntary under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 45 L. Ed. (2d) 562 (1975), because he was not warned of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. High v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. McLaurenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. CashCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. CampenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API