Legal Opinion

Feldman/Matz Interests, L.L.P. v. Settlement Capital Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided July 13, 2004No. 14-03-01103-CVPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

In this consolidated mandamus action and accelerated interlocutory appeal, we not only have to decide if the Federal Arbitration Act or the Texas Arbitration Act applies, but also if the trial court had to refer the entire case — including the plaintiffs request for injunctive relief against the defendants — to arbitration. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Federal Arbitration Act applies and that the trial judge should have referred all of the case, including the in-junctive relief request, to arbitration. As a result, we…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. L & L Kempwood Associates, L.P. v. Omega Builders, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Performance Unlimited, Inc. v. Questar Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In Re Brock Specialty Services, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  2. Rapid Settlements Ltd. v. SSC Settlements, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  3. Metra United Escalante, L.P. v. Lynd Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Frontera Generation Ltd. Partnership v. Mission Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
  5. In Re HEB Grocery Co., LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API