Legal Opinion

Detroit Graphite Co. v. Hoover

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 5, 1930No. Nos. 2424, 2425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

These cross-suits arise out of a contract of employment of Hoover by the Detroit Graphite Company, for five years from March 31, 1923. Hoover contends that the contract was broken by the Detroit Company in March, 1926; the Detroit Company contends that it was then ended by mutual agreement; that Hoover then owed the company $11,770.59 for advances made to him under the contract; it brought suit therefor. The jury found for Hoover, in both suits, and assessed his damages for breach of contract at $50,000.

The main questions arise from the company’s contentions that the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixie Glass Co. v. PollakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Sheridan v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & JoinersDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  4. Conjugal Partnership Comprised by Jones v. Conjugal Partnership Comprised by PinedaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
  5. Metropolitan Broadcasting Corporation v. Mortimer C. LebowitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API