Legal Opinion
Slakoff v. Hitchcock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East Hampton, dated September 18, 1990, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioners’ application for an area variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), entered February 19, 1991, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioners are the owners of approximately two acres of property in a residential neighborhood in East Hampton, Long Island. A plot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nammack v. KrucklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Naumann v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlucci v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rosewood Home Builders, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Shaughessy v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Delavore v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Seumenicht v. Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995