Legal Opinion

Shaughessy v. Roth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Babylon dated February 24, 1989, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioners’ application for a use variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), entered September 9, 1991, which annulled the determination and directed the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the petitioners’ application for a use variance.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioners sought a use variance in order to build a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Lund v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sautner v. AmsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Henthorne v. MolloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Moore v. Town of Islip Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Richter v. CurranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Scholl v. EderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API