Seumenicht v. Zoning Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Rye, dated June 10, 1993, which denied the petitioner’s application for an area variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered December 14, 1993, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and granted the petitioner a variance.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
The petitioner, Karl H. Seumenicht, had a deck…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bienstock v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Slakoff v. HitchcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bari Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Vimplex Corp. v. ChinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001