In re Mackie
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The respondent’s brief reveals that the respondent was discharged from the mental health facility on 9 March 1978. Nevertheless, our courts have made it clear that a prior discharge will not render questions challenging the involuntary commitment proceeding moot. In re Hatley, 291 N.C. 693, 231 S.E. 2d 633 (1977).
In order to support the recommitment of a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding, the trial court must find, “by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others, . . .…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re HatleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re BentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re WhatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- In Re BookerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- In Re AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.