Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos Renan Orellana-Blanco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2002No. 01-10045PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

This criminal case requires application of the hearsay rule and the confrontation clause to a law enforcement memorandum of an interview.

Facts

Appellant Santos Orellana-Bianco was convicted after a jury trial of marriage fraud 1 and making a false statement on an immigration document. 2 The theory of the prosecution’s case was that he fraudulently married a woman, Beatrice Boehm, to evade restrictions in the immigration laws, and that he lied in his sworn statement and other papers by stating that he was married to her and lived with her when the marriage was actually…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Samuel Orozco-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Nikos Delano DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API