O'KEEFE v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The facts, which involve the validity of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission establishing maximum allowances to and divisions of joint rates, with tap lines by trunk lines, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill filed by appellant, as Receiver of the New Orleans, Texas and Mexico Railroad Company, against the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, praying the annulment of an order of the Commission, dated July 29, 1914, made in the Tap Line Cases, following the decision of this court reported in 234 U. S. 1. The order required certain trunk line railway companies, including the New Orleans, Texas & Mexico, to reopen through routes and publish joint rates to interstate destinations with certain tap lines, including Louisiana and Pacific…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DiffenbaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tap Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by26 opinions
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.