Legal Opinion

People v. Deskin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1992No. F015872PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, P. J.—

Statement of the Case

Becki Leanne Deskin was convicted by a jury of misdemeanor child endangerment (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (2)), 1 a lesser included offense of felony child endangerment (§ 273a, subd. (1)). In the unpublished portion of this opinion we consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. In the published portion we consider whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague. We will affirm the judgment.

Statement of Facts *

Discussion

I. Was the conviction for misdemeanor child endangerment (§ 273a, subd. (2)), supported by sufficient evidence? *

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Erlich v. Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. PrevostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. LinwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API