Legal Opinion
People v. Prevost
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1998No. B103652PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.
Appellants were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, sell and/or advertise cable television signal decoder boxes without the authorization of a franchised or licensed cable television system in violation of Penal Code section 593d, former subdivision (b). On appeal appellants challenge the constitutionality of section 593d, former subdivision (b), arguing it is vague and contravenes federal law. They also attack the sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions. Appellants further contend that their convictions are invalid because they were charged…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- DirecTV, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.