Legal Opinion

People v. Barger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1979No. Civ. 46101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.

Following his indictments, February 10, 1972, and June 14, 1972, for felonious offenses, defendant Ralph Barger’s motion for appointment of private counsel at public expense was granted by the superior court. The court’s order as here relevant provided: “Without prejudice, this Court now will appoint private counsel to represent the defendant, Ralph Barger, but likewise, the Court invokes the provisions of Section 987.8, Penal Code, and pursuant thereto, reserves to the trial court upon the conclusion of the criminal proceedings, . . .” Appointment of private…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Brandenburger v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bold v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Leahey v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. SpurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Lezama v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API