Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Spurlock

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1980No. Crim. 10232PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of three counts of selling marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11360, subd. (a)), one count of offering to sell a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11382), one count of cultivation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358), and one count of possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359). Challenging the court’s definition of marijuana and its post-trial orders, defendant appeals.

This case is in part controlled by People v. Van Alstyne (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 900 [121 Cal.Rptr. 363], which dealt with the question of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AmorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. Van AlstyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. BargerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. FloresCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. KunkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API