Legal Opinion

Installment Finance Corp. v. Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1990No. 64131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from summary judgments in favor of both defendants below. The primary issues are whether a party holding a security interest in an automobile may recover damages for conversion from a tag agent who releases the secured party’s lien by omitting it from a new certificate of title based upon a forged lien release form and whether the party may recover damages for conversion from an automobile dealer who purchases and resells the automobile after the lien is released by the tag agent.

We hold that appellant failed to plead and establish in summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steenbergen v. First Federal Savings & Loan of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Davidson v. First Bank & Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Davidson v. First Bank and Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Eastex Aviation, Inc. v. The Sperry and Hutchinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Benton v. OrtenbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawmaster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL GROUP, INC. v. TECHTROL, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL GROUP, INC. v. TECHTROL, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Hemp Hydrate Brands Corporation v. Private Label Supplements IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API