Legal Opinion
Urban v. Beloit Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 2, 1985No. 84SA298PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
Robert Urban was injured while operating a machine manufactured by Beloit Corporation. Urban sued Beloit for damages resulting from this injury, and Beloit moved for summary judgment based solely on a Colorado statute of repose. The Denver District Court granted the summary judgment motion, and Urban appealed. We conclude that a genuine issue of material fact remains unresolved and therefore reverse the judgment of the district court.
I
Urban was employed by Packaging Corporation of America. As part of his em*686ployment duties, he operated a “calendar stack” machine. The machine was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Benton-Volvo-Metairie, Inc., and Benton Auto Works International, Inc., D/B/A Benton-Volvo-New Orleans v. Volvo Southwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Abrahamsen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Pueblo West Metropolitan District v. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Primock v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Anderson v. M.W. Kellogg Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Paul Eaton v. Jarvis Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Eaton v. Jarvis Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.