Legal Opinion

Pueblo West Metropolitan District v. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 22, 1984No. 82SA225PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

The protestants, Pueblo West Metropolitan District, City of Florence, and St. Charles Mesa Water Association (“protestants”), appeal1 orders of summary judgment entered against them by the Division No. 2 water court on their protest to the entry of partially absolute decrees for storage of water in Pueblo Reservoir and Turquoise Lake. We affirm the judgment.

I

For many years the Arkansas River and its tributaries constituted the principal source of water for the Arkansas River Valley in southeastern Colorado. In order to supplement this flow of water the United States Congress in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Bailey v. ClausenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. Application of Bubb v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. O. C. Kinney, Inc. v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Board of the County Commissioners v. Crystal Creek Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. United States v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API