Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1965No. Crim. 10089PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

Defendants Rodriguez and Hernandez were charged by information with one count of violation of Health and Safety Code section 11500.5 (possession of heroin for sale) and a second count of violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530 (possession of marijuana). Each defendant pleaded not guilty and waived trial by jury. The court found defendants guilty on count I and not guilty on count II.

Both defendants are appealing from the judgment.

Statement of Facts

On February 11, 1963, Officer Sanchez, a policeman assigned to the narcotics division of the Los Angeles police department, was told by a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alvidres v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. FitzwaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API