Legal Opinion

People v. Fitzwater

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1968No. Crim. 6146PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.

—Count I of an information charged that appellant conspired with Paul Van de Bogart to violate Health and Safety Code, sections 11530 (possession of marijuana), 11500 (possession of peyote), 11500 (possession of demerol) and 11531 (sale of marijuana), and Business and Professions Code, sections 4227 and 4230 (sale and possession, respectively, of dangerous drugs). The conspiracy count set forth 12 overt acts alleged to have been committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. In successive counts, appellant was charged with possession of three narcotics for sale, in violation of the Health and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. People v. FusaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Frazzini v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API