Legal Opinion
Hockstok v. Hockstok
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2002No. 2001-2134PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} Third-party defendants-appellants, Robert and Jeri Hockstok, appeal from the judgment of the Licking County Court of Appeals reversing the trial court’s denial of the motion of plaintiff-appellee, Jennifer Gorslene, f.k.a. Hockstok, for an order reallocating parental rights.
*239I. Facts
{¶ 2} This case originates from a complaint filed on July 15, 1994, by Jennifer Gorslene to establish the paternity of her child, Christopher Michael Hockstok, born on May 28, 1993. The magistrate found Shane R. Huck to be the biological father of Gorslene’s child and designated Gorslene to be the child’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Boyer v. BoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Masitto v. MasittoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In re C.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. V.K.B. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re JamesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.