Legal Opinion

Stull v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 21, 1959No. 18,515PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

Stull was accused by information of the crime of receiving stolen goods, and upon trial was found guilty by the jury. From the ensuing judgment and sentence he *280sues out this writ of error. In the proceeding before us he assigns twenty-six grounds for reversal, all of which easily fall into five general categories. One of these, insufficiency of evidence to sustain a conviction, compels reversal of the judgment, and to this we now attend.

The chief prosecution witness, an unmarried female, was the cashier-bookkeeper of the Rocky Mountain Bank Note Company. Stull, a married man, was a salesman…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Warford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Reppin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Jaynes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Melcher v. BeelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. People v. SpotoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. CzemerynskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. GarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API